Techniques

How to catalogue and tag mixed-media materials for instant repeatable results across projects

How to catalogue and tag mixed-media materials for instant repeatable results across projects

I keep a running inventory of everything I use in the studio — from the archival gesso I prefer for panels to the exact make of sumi ink I reach for when I want a fast, staining line. Over the years I developed a simple, repeatable system for cataloguing and tagging mixed-media materials that saves me time, reduces waste, and helps me recreate textures or colour interactions across different projects. Below I’ll walk you through the practical setup I use, with examples and templates you can adopt or adapt.

Why catalogue and tag materials?

When I first started experimenting with layered surfaces, I would make a piece I liked and then struggle to remember the sequence of grounds, mediums and marks that made it work. Cataloguing does three things for my practice:

  • It makes results repeatable — I can recreate a texture or effect months later.
  • It saves money — I stop buying duplicate or incompatible products.
  • It builds a searchable reference — I know which combinations are archival, which yellow, which crackle.
  • Decide on a simple taxonomy

    Choose a set of consistent tags you will actually use. Overcomplicated taxonomies become unused papers in a drawer. My top-level tags are practical and action-driven:

  • Material type: paint, ground, medium, ink, paper, textile, adhesive, pigment, found object.
  • Behaviour: staining, opaque, absorbent, flexible, rigid, soluble, non-soluble.
  • Finish: matte, satin, gloss, satin-matte, semi-gloss.
  • Interaction: adhesion (high/low), cracking, peeling, lifting, yellowing, water-reactive.
  • Colour role: base, underpainting, highlight, wash, linework.
  • These tags let me search by outcome — for instance “staining + water-reactive + ink” finds the marks that will bleed into a wash versus sit on top.

    What to record for each item

    For each material I keep a short card (digital or physical) with the following fields. I use both a Google Sheet and physical swatch cards stuck onto a board above my desk.

    FieldWhy it matters
    Brand & product nameExact reference for repurchasing and cross-checking MSDS.
    Type / categoryQuick filter: acrylic, oil, gouache, PVA, etc.
    Batch / colour codeHelps for pigment variation between batches.
    Behaviour tagsStaining, flex, soluble, etc — for performance searches.
    Usage notesHow I typically use it: “thin with water for washes” or “apply heavy for impasto”.
    Surface compatibilityWorks on gessoed board, cotton rag paper, primed linen?
    Image / swatchSmall photo and a painted swatch showing opacity and texture.
    Mixes & recipesCommon mixes (e.g. “2:1 acrylic gel to ultramarine”) so results are repeatable.
    Ageing notesYellowing or cracking observed over time.

    Make visual swatches non-negotiable

    A written description is useful, but nothing replaces a visual swatch. I make a swatch card for every pigment, adhesive, ground and medium I buy:

  • Apply the product in one thin layer and a heavy layer on a labelled strip of board or paper.
  • Photograph under consistent daylight with a grey card (I use a small X-Rite card taped nearby).
  • Write fast notes directly on the card: drying time, opacity, how it layers with varnish.
  • When you’re searching for “transparent red wash over gesso” you’ll instantly see candidates and remember how they behaved.

    Digital workflow: simple, searchable, shareable

    I keep a Google Sheet that mirrors my physical cards and adds functionality:

  • Columns match the table above, plus a URL to the product page and a cell with the swatch photo.
  • Use one column for tags separated by commas — this makes filtering and searching trivial. Example: “ink, staining, water-reactive, linework”.
  • Colour code rows by material family for visual scanning.
  • Keep a ‘Projects used in’ column so you can track which pieces used a material — this is invaluable when you want to replicate something from an old portfolio.
  • You can export this sheet into a printable catalogue if you prefer a physical archive.

    Tagging for process, not just product

    I tag not only the products but the processes I use with them. Example tags I routinely add:

  • “Underpainted with glazing”
  • “Sand between layers”
  • “Use heat to speed cure”
  • “Resists when applied over oil”
  • These process tags help me remember the gestures and timings that matter — not just the materials themselves.

    Examples: How I document a mixed-media layer

    Here’s one card example from a piece I returned to three times in a year:

  • Brand: Winsor & Newton Professional Acrylic
  • Colour: Payne’s Grey, Series 3
  • Type: Acrylic (heavy body)
  • Behaviour tags: semi-opaque, fast-drying, flexible
  • Usage: Dilute 1:2 with water for glazes; 1:1 with gloss medium for deeper colour and sheen
  • Surface compatibility: Gessoed birch, canvas, heavyweight 300gsm paper
  • Swatch notes: Darkens when varnished; slight shift towards blue
  • Project links: “Coastal Memory #3”, “Fragmented Shore study”
  • Label storage for instant access

    Storage is a big part of repeatability. I label containers with product name and the date opened. For mixed or custom recipes, I use small airtight jars with a printed sticker: recipe name, ratio, date created, expected shelf life. My labels include QR codes that point to the Google Sheet entry — a tiny QR-generator and label printer (Brother P-touch or Dymo) makes this quick to set up.

    Testing protocols for critical interactions

    When I plan a piece that relies on a specific interaction — say, wet-in-wet bleeding between ink and wash — I make a short test strip. Tests are short and consistent: same substrate, same humidity conditions if possible, same seeding (brush type, dilution). I keep the tests adjacent to the swatch cards with a note “Pass” or “Fail” and what to tweak.

    Share and collaborate

    If you teach or collaborate, a tidy, shared catalogue is a gift. I export a pared back version of my sheet as a PDF for workshop handouts — students love having a “cheat-sheet” of materials with quick tags that relate to exercises. When working with a framer or conservationist, I’ll hand over the product list and ageing notes so they understand long-term behaviour.

    Maintain it — 15 minutes a week

    The biggest barrier to any system is inertia. I set aside a 15-minute slot every Sunday to add new purchases, photograph used tubes, and tick off materials I’ve run out of. Small, regular updates keep the catalogue useful and prevent the pile-up that kills so many good intentions.

    Once you have a simple tag set, visual swatches, and a short testing protocol, your studio becomes a reproducible lab. You’ll waste less time guessing, spend more time making, and find that the surprising effects you love can be summoned again — reliably — whenever you need them.

    You should also check the following news:

    How to structure a 60-minute studio critique session to level up a body of work before exhibition

    How to structure a 60-minute studio critique session to level up a body of work before exhibition

    I run and take part in a lot of studio critiques — as a teacher, organiser and fellow maker —...

    Mar 12
    Exactly how to photograph metallic and iridescent pigments without hotspots using household lights

    Exactly how to photograph metallic and iridescent pigments without hotspots using household lights

    I spend a lot of time photographing test swatches, small paintings and pigment studies that contain...

    Mar 07